LINGUIST List 30.1982

Thu May 09 2019

Calls: Cog Sci, Comp Ling, Gen Ling, Pragmatics, Psycholing/Germany

Editor for this issue: Everett Green <everettlinguistlist.org>



Date: 08-May-2019
From: Torgrim Solstad <solstadleibniz-zas.de>
Subject: Contrasting Underspecification and Overspecification of Discourse Relations
E-mail this message to a friend

Full Title: Contrasting Underspecification and Overspecification of Discourse Relations

Date: 25-Sep-2019 - 26-Sep-2019
Location: Berlin, Germany
Contact Person: Torgrim Solstad
Meeting Email: < click here to access email >
Web Site: https://www.xprag.de/?page_id=6215

Linguistic Field(s): Cognitive Science; Computational Linguistics; General Linguistics; Pragmatics; Psycholinguistics

Call Deadline: 01-Jun-2019

Meeting Description:

Following the successful XPrag.de-workshop ''Implicit and explicit marking of discourse relations'' in Osnabrück in 2018, we are organizing a second XPrag.de-workshop on discourse relations with a different focus.

The workshop will take place at the Leibniz-Centre General Linguistics (ZAS) in Berlin on September 25-26, 2019. Our goal is to identify factors that contribute to the decision of violating or following economy principles in the marking of discourse relations, in particular with regard to over- vs. underspecification.

Invited Speakers:

- Nicholas Asher (CNRS Toulouse)
- Katja Jasinskaja (University of Cologne)
- Arndt Riester (University of Cologne)
- Hannah Rohde (University of Edinburgh)

Organizers:

- Anton Benz (ZAS)
- Oliver Bott (University of Tübingen)
- Mingya Liu (Osnabrück University)
- Torgrim Solstad (ZAS)

2nd Call for Papers:

Most of the literature and tools on discourse relations (DRs) focus on information-exchanging situations, where speaker and hearer share communicative goals. Therefore, the identification of a DR in the absence of explicit marking presupposes that there is one DR intended by the cooperative speaker. One possible reason for the lack of marking is to obey economy principles, e.g. when discourse context makes it clear which DR is meant. However, the assumption of a specific, implicit DR is questionable. For example, when two events follow each other temporally, speakers may still be uncertain whether one is the cause for the other, and thus, opt for not using ''because'' to avoid over-commitment. Another point in case would be strategic situations in which speakers would choose to remain vague by avoiding the explicit marking of DRs or by using markers that are notoriously underspecified, such as ''and''. This is important for DR annotations since the information of the speaker’s epistemic state is hard to detect from written texts. On the other hand, DRs may also be multiply marked. Such overspecification also challenges economy principles, and the rationality behind it needs further investigation. With this workshop, we aim to identify factors that contribute to the decision of violating or following economy principles in the marking of DRs, in particular over- vs. underspecification.

Abstracts are invited for 20-minute talks and posters. Topics may be related (but not limited) to various kinds of DRs that allow both explicit and implicit marking such as conditionals and causals. We particularly encourage contributions that take a production perspective in cooperative vs. strategic situations to shed light on the gaps and overlaps between production and comprehension. Below are listed a few dimensions which may prove important for the decision to underspecify, specify, or over-specify a DR:

- Linguistic complexity of DRs
- Predictability of a DR from context
- Cognitive costs/resources for inferring a DR
- Pragmatic constraints (e.g. avoidance of ambiguity or avoidance of falsity)
- Strategic communication: the strategic speaker may opt for implicit DR marking to foster e.g. plausible deniability
- Availability of fast and automatic mechanisms generating DR predictions
- Interlocutors' familiarity with the current (local) discourse topic

Abstract Submission:

Abstracts must be anonymous, and should be limited to a maximum of two pages of text, including tables, figures, and references. Pages should be US Letter or A4, with one inch margins, and a minimum font size of 11pt (Times New Roman). Abstracts can be submitted via email to:

discrel2019leibniz-zas.de

Important Dates:

Abstract submission deadline: June 1, 2019
Notification of acceptance: Early July, 2019
Conference dates: September 25-26, 2019

Contact Information:

Email: discrel2019leibniz-zas.de
Website: https://www.xprag.de/?page_id=6215

Co-located Event:

We would like to call your attention to the DETEC conference on September 27-28, 2019, directly following this workshop, also to be held at ZAS (Berlin):

''Discourse Expectations: Theoretical, Experimental, and Computational Perspectives'' (DETEC2019) with Elsi Kaiser, Alex Lascarides and Mante Nieuwland as invited speakers.

For further information, visit:

http://www.leibniz-zas.de/workshop_detec2019.html




Page Updated: 09-May-2019