LINGUIST List 8.250

Fri Feb 21 1997

FYI: Public perception of linguistics

Editor for this issue: Ann Dizdar <annlinguistlist.org>


Directory

  • Trey Jones, apparently linguists-are-no-damn-good

    Message 1: apparently linguists-are-no-damn-good

    Date: Fri, 14 Feb 1997 12:21:00 -0500
    From: Trey Jones <TJonesdataware.com>
    Subject: apparently linguists-are-no-damn-good


    Greetings, LINGUISTs..

    I just got this from a friend on the TechWriting List.. Many of the people over there hold linguistics and linguists in rather low regard. I've had a couple of pretty fierce fights with some of them, only to conclude that some people really will never see that anything other than prescriptivism is acceptable, logical, or even sane.

    There have been numerous discussions on LINGUIST in the past about the public perception and understanding of linguistics, and what could be done to improve both. Sadly, I fear that things have taken a turn for the worse. Read on..

    > From: Mark Halpern > To: TECHWR-LLISTSERV.OKSTATE.EDU > Subject: linguists-are-no-damn-good paper finally published > Date: Wednesday, February 12, 1997 4:31PM > > Colleagues, > > A long time ago, in a galaxy far away, I > announced to you that a paper I'd written > on linguists and their relation to correct > usage was to be published in the Atlantic > Monthly. Probably few are still alive to > remember that announcement, and those > few probably think I must have been > hallucinating -- and from time to time I'd > have agreed with them. But the process > has ground on, and finally spit the paper > out: it will appear in the March issue, on > the stands around the 25th of this month. > > Of course what has been published is a > radically abbreviated and somewhat > bowdlerized version of what I wrote, so > my pleasure is qualified, but I'm hoping > that it's interesting or challenging enough > as it stands to get people to request the > full-strength version from me, which I'll be > happy to send them. The Atlantic posts > the entire editorial contents of each issue, > a couple of weeks after it hits the stands, > to their Web site, and invites readers to > engage in a dialogue with the authors; > see you on the Web, I hope! > > Mark Halpern > mhalpern scopus.com