We Have a New Site!
With the help of your donations we have been making good progress on designing and launching our new website! Check it out at https://linguistlist.org/!***We are still in our beta stages for the new site--if you have any feedback, be sure to let us know at webdevlinguistlist.org***
Journal Information
| Title: | Concordia Discors vs Discordia Concors: Researches into Comparative Literature, Contrastive Linguist |
| Publisher: | Editura Universitatii STEFAN cel MARE Suceava, Romania |
| URL: | http://condisdiscon.blogspot.com/2015/02/aims-and-scope.html |
| Description: | Concordia Discors vs Discordia Concors is a self-supporting peer-reviewed open access annual academic journal of international scope. It provides an interdisciplinary forum for the publication of high-quality articles on comparative literature, contrastive linguistics, cross-cultural and translation strategies.Acutely aware of the challenging task they are hereby taking on, in an effort to efface “one of the consummate ironies of history [,] that Comparatists, for so long the fringe radicals of academe, have become the ultimate insiders of 21st century cultural studies” (Redmond 2003:Comparative Literature in the 21st Century), the editors invite articles offering interesting suggestions for employment of new research tools and techniques, and revealing ‘untrodden paths’, in short, contributing original comparative research conducted on the major topics put forward for investigation by issues to come Condordia Discors vs Discordia Concors: Researches into Comparative Literature, Contrastive Linguistics, Cross-Cultural and Translation Strategies |
| ISSN: | 2457-8835 |
| Linguistic Field(s): |
Not Applicable |
| Language Specialty: |
English
French German Italian Romanian Spanish Japanese Family Sino-Tibetan Germanic Romance Slavic Subgroup Indo-European Latin Subgroup |
|
About LINGUIST
|
Contact Us
|
Report Broken Link
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents. |