We Have a New Site!
With the help of your donations we have been making good progress on designing and launching our new website! Check it out at https://linguistlist.org/!***We are still in our beta stages for the new site--if you have any feedback, be sure to let us know at webdevlinguistlist.org***
Academic Paper |
|
|
|
|
| Title: | Effects of bilingualism, noise, and reverberation on speech perception by listeners with normal hearing |
| Author: | Catherine L. Rogers |
| Institution: | University of South Florida |
| Author: | Jennifer J. Lister |
| Institution: | University of South Florida |
| Author: | Dashielle M. Febo |
| Institution: | University of South Florida |
| Author: | Joan M. Besing |
| Institution: | Montclair State University |
| Author: | Harvey B. Abrams |
| Institution: | Walter Reed Army Medical Center |
| Linguistic Field: | Psycholinguistics |
| Abstract: | This study compared monosyllabic word recognition in quiet, noise, and noise with reverberation for 15 monolingual American English speakers and 12 Spanish–English bilinguals who had learned English prior to 6 years of age and spoke English without a noticeable foreign accent. Significantly poorer word recognition scores were obtained for the bilingual listeners than for the monolingual listeners under conditions of noise and noise with reverberation, but not in quiet. Although bilinguals with little or no foreign accent in their second language are often assumed by their peers, or their clinicians in the case of hearing loss, to be identical in perceptual abilities to monolinguals, the present data suggest that they may have greater difficulty in recognizing words in noisy or reverberant listening environments. |
|
|
|
|
This article appears IN Applied Psycholinguistics Vol. 27, Issue 3. |
|
Add a new paper
Return to Academic Papers main page Return to Directory of Linguists main page |
|
|
About LINGUIST
|
Contact Us
|
Report Broken Link
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents. |